Or: in shops you will see the specifications and pictures bouquet garni of the first revision stand

Dear visitor. You are seeing this text because AdBlocker, bouquet garni plugin or software blocking our ads. Hardware.Info publishes annually bouquet garni thousands of free news and hundreds bouquet garni of articles on thousands of test results. That is only possible thanks to the revenue from ads. Hence: white-list our site as you find them useful. Click here for more info.
NEWS REVIEWS ADVICE price MAGAZINE TV COMMUNITY FORUM PRODUCT bouquet garni INFO News External news Newsletter Review summary bouquet garni External reviews PC Advice Warranty Guide Notebook Performance Index Build your own PC Hardware.Info Benchmarks Price comparison Ongecategoriseerd search Shop Overview Shop Experience add Popular products Wish List Brands Hardware.Info Magazine Subscribe Contact bouquet garni Retailers Hardware .info TV Loose items Hardware.Info TV on your television User Systems User benchmarks Product Experiences User systems statistics Contests / Actions Latest reactions Forum Home Activity My forums My threads New Posts Recent Posts Hardware.Info House Rules Search Settings PC components
PC accessories Housing accessories Card Readers KVM switches Cards USB Hubs
Reviews Spot the difference: bouquet garni Gigabyte motherboard revisions perform noticeably different
A few days ago appeared a question on our forum by a user who bought a Gigabyte motherboard with properties different from the original version and the pictures shown in the shop where the product was purchased. Just Googling around and click on the Gigabyte site quickly bouquet garni shows that the Taiwanese manufacturer of motherboards is very much new revisions, mostly in the budget segment. For us reason to dive even in this case and new version of plates to buy and test. With interesting results due to ...
Since time immemorial makes Gigabyte motherboards with new revisions of the same type code. In itself customary and nothing where the manufacturer does secretive about. New signs will be referred to as, for example, 2.0 Rev and Rev 3.0. Lately, these revisions, however, seem to mainly because of cost savings to be made: in the case of our tested plates there are very obvious differences, bouquet garni such as the reduction of the number of phases bouquet garni of the CPU power supply and in one case, even the removal of a second BIOS chip.
Although Gigabyte there to some degree honestly about on its website (although changes such as reduced number of stages is not reflected in the official specification tables), this is a way of working that we can welcome not matter. That has everything to do with how the new products are released by Gigabyte bouquet garni to men. With the new products are namely the exact same manufacturer codes and barcodes (EAN's) and for the first version. This allows distributors and online bouquet garni retailers that work with these codes based auto clutches, not tell the difference. This means they can from one moment to get it delivered another product without knowing it. And as a distributor and shop do not know, is it for you as a customer already quite unclear.
Or: in shops you will see the specifications and pictures bouquet garni of the first revision stand, but when you order you will probably receive bouquet garni a newer revision. Because price comparison sites - such as Hardware.Info - also based on EAN product codes and the same applies there: because the codes do not change come the new revisions not on the radar and remain old and specifications are photos. Even if it is for you as a customer not clear what you get when you order a product.
Creating new revisions of the same products with existing codes is not something that just does Gigabyte. We have behind the scenes, for example, already had serious discussions with food manufacturers Nexus, Antec, Seasonic and XFX, who use this same practice. An important difference discussed in all cases with them were the new products clearly better than the predecessors. Although we nevertheless believe that the new codes should be used for significant product changes, the course is very less people to send a better product than a product that is just worse.
One on the situation of Gigabyte similar example of a while back Kingston V300 SSD that her suddenly went with a different type of flash memory, which in many benchmark gave significantly lower performance (click here for a comparison chart). Kingstons defense then was that in the official specifications mentioned characteristics nothing had changed - in this case the type of memory was not part of Kingston's official specification list. The same argument applies in most cases